THE ONTOLOGY OF WAGES: HUMAN CAPITAL, DIGITALISATION, AND INSTITUTIONAL MEDI ATION IN A TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18811830Keywords:
Human Capital Theory; Digital Labour Markets; Institutional Mediation; Microeconomic Foundations; Labour Market Structure; Transitional Economy; Wage Formation; Economic Inequality; Technological ChangeAbstract
This article develops a conceptual and philosophical reassessment of wage determination in transitional labour
markets. Rather than concentrating solely on empirical estimation or econometric modelling, it examines the ontological
and epistemological foundations underlying dominant theories of wage formation—particularly human capital theory,
skill-biased technological change, and institutional approaches to labour markets. The study seeks to clarify what wages
represent as economic phenomena and how they should be understood within structurally transforming economies.
The analysis revisits the classical human capital framework, including the Mincer earnings function, alongside contemporary
perspectives that emphasise digitalisation, artificial intelligence, labour market segmentation, and institutional mediation.
However, instead of treating these frameworks merely as technical tools for regression analysis, the article interrogates
their implicit assumptions about productivity, causality, equilibrium adjustment, and the role of institutions. It evaluates
how concepts such as nonlinearity, structural heterogeneity, digital divides, and institutional rigidities challenge the view
of wages as purely competitive market outcomes determined exclusively by individual productivity.
Special emphasis is placed on transitional and structurally volatile economies, where wage formation often reflects the
coexistence of market mechanisms, institutional legacies, regulatory constraints, and uneven technological diffusion. In
such contexts, wages emerge not simply as the price of labour in equilibrium but as institutionally embedded outcomes
shaped by bargaining structures, sectoral composition, digital access, ownership patterns, and exposure to economic
shocks. The article argues that wage determination must be conceptualised as a multi-layered process mediated by
institutional design, structural transformation, and evolving technological regimes.
Methodologically, the study adopts a structured analytical and philosophical review approach. It contrasts theoretical
propositions with micro-level empirical evidence from transitional economies while clarifying the ontological status of
wages and the epistemological strategies used to study them. Within this framework, wages are conceptualised as
observable monetary outcomes that reflect deeper structural and institutional mechanisms rather than as direct proxies
for marginal productivity alone.
The contribution of the article lies in reframing wage determination within a coherent philosophical perspective that
integrates human capital theory, digital transformation, and institutional economics. By synthesising theoretical debates
and methodological considerations, the study establishes a rigorous conceptual foundation for future micro-level empirical
modelling and policy-oriented research aimed at promoting equitable and productivity-enhancing wage structures in
economies undergoing digital and structural transformation.
References
Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2011) ‘Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings’,
Handbook of Labor Economics, 4B, pp. 1043–1171.
Autor, D.H. (2014) ‘Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”’, Science,
(6186), pp. 843–851.
Autor, D.H., Levy, F. and Murnane, R.J. (2003) ‘The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical
exploration’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), pp. 1279–1333.
Becker, G.S. (1962) ‘Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis’, Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), pp. 9–49.
Becker, G.S. (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Card, D. (1999) ‘The causal effect of education on earnings’, Handbook of Labor Economics, 3A, pp. 1801–1863.
Dearden, L., Reed, H. and Van Reenen, J. (2006) ‘The impact of training on productivity and wages’, Oxford Bulletin
of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), pp. 397–421.
DiNardo, J., Fortin, N.M. and Lemieux, T. (1996) ‘Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages’, Econometrica,
(5), pp. 1001–1044.
Heckman, J.J. (1979) ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica, 47(1), pp. 153–161.
Kahn, L.M. (2010) ‘The long-term labor market consequences of graduating from college in a bad economy’, Labour
Economics, 17(2), pp. 303–316.
Mincer, J. (1974) Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: NBER.
North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spence, M. (1973) ‘Job market signaling’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), pp. 355–374.
Stiglitz, J.E. (2002) ‘Information and the change in the paradigm in economics’, American Economic Review, 92(3),
pp. 460–501.
Veum, J.R. (1995) ‘Sources of training and their impact on wages’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(4), pp.
–826.
World Bank (2022) World Development Report 2022: Finance for an Equitable Recovery. Washington, DC: World
Bank.
World Bank (2023) Individuals Using the Internet (% of population). Available at: https://data.worldbank.org.
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A. (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York:
Crown.
Goldin, C. and Katz, L.F. (2008) The Race between Education and Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
