INFLATION, ECONOMIC GROWTH, AND UNEMPLOYMENT: REVISITING THE PHILLIPS AND OKUN FRAMEWORKS IN THE CONTEXT OF JOB CREATION

INFLATION, ECONOMIC GROWTH, AND UNEMPLOYMENT: REVISITING THE PHILLIPS AND OKUN FRAMEWORKS IN THE CONTEXT OF JOB CREATION

Authors

  • Zakhidov Azizbek Rustamovich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18726047

Keywords:

Inflation; Economic Growth; Unemployment; Phillips Curve; Okun’s Law; Job Creation; Macroeconomic Stability.

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review of the theoretical and empirical literature examining the interrelationship
between inflation, economic growth, and unemployment within the frameworks of the Phillips Curve and Okun’s Law.
The study critically reassesses these foundational macroeconomic relationships in the context of job creation and job
destruction, with particular attention to emerging and transitional economies.
The review synthesises classical, expectations-augmented, and New Keynesian interpretations of the inflation–
unemployment trade-off, alongside modern extensions incorporating nonlinearity, asymmetry, and structural breaks
in the growth–unemployment nexus. It evaluates how macroeconomic instability, supply shocks, policy regimes, and
institutional characteristics influence the stability and magnitude of these relationships over time.
Special attention is devoted to empirical evidence from developing and post-transition economies, where traditional
linear specifications often fail to capture labour market dynamics. The article highlights the importance of incorporating
cyclical asymmetries, business-cycle phases, and structural constraints when analysing employment responses to
macroeconomic fluctuations.
Methodologically, the study adopts a structured analytical review approach, comparing theoretical propositions with crosscountry
empirical findings. Job creation and job destruction are conceptualised as macroeconomically driven processes
shaped not only by output dynamics but also by inflation expectations, monetary–fiscal coordination, and institutional
settings.
The contribution of the article lies in integrating the Phillips and Okun frameworks into a unified analytical perspective
that links macroeconomic volatility to employment dynamics. By systematising existing evidence, the review provides a
conceptual foundation for future empirical modelling and policy design aimed at promoting sustainable and employmentintensive
economic growth.

Author Biography

Zakhidov Azizbek Rustamovich

Westminster International University in Tashkent
Part-time PhD student

References

Ball, L., Leigh, D. and Loungani, P. (2017) ‘Okun’s law: Fit at 50?’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 49(7), pp.

–1441.

Ball, L. and Mazumder, S. (2019) ‘A Phillips curve with anchored expectations and short-term unemployment’, Journal

of Money, Credit and Banking, 51(1), pp. 111–137.

Baker, S.R., Bloom, N. and Davis, S.J. (2016) ‘Measuring economic policy uncertainty’, The Quarterly Journal of

Economics, 131(4), pp. 1593–1636.

Blanchard, O. (2017) Macroeconomics. 7th edn. Boston: Pearson.

Blanchard, O. and Leigh, D. (2013) ‘Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers’, American Economic Review, 103(3),

pp. 117–120.

Boeri, T. and Terrell, K. (2002) ‘Institutional determinants of labor reallocation in transition’, Journal of Economic

Perspectives, 16(1), pp. 51–76.

Clarida, R., Galí, J. and Gertler, M. (1999) ‘The science of monetary policy: A New Keynesian perspective’, Journal of

Economic Literature, 37(4), pp. 1661–1707.

Cuaresma, J.C. (2003) ‘Okun’s law revisited’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(4), pp. 439–451.

Friedman, M. (1968) ‘The role of monetary policy’, American Economic Review, 58(1), pp. 1–17.

Galí, J. and Gertler, M. (1999) ‘Inflation dynamics: A structural econometric analysis’, Journal of Monetary Economics,

(2), pp. 195–222.

Gordon, R.J. (2011) ‘The history of the Phillips curve: Consensus and bifurcation’, Economica, 78(309), pp. 10–50.

Jordà, Ò., Singh, S.R. and Taylor, A.M. (2020) ‘Longer-run economic consequences of pandemics’, Review of

Economics and Statistics, 102(5), pp. 933–951.

Knotek, E.S. and Terry, S.J. (2009) ‘How will unemployment fare following the recession?’, Economic Review, Federal

Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp. 5–33.

Lee, J. (2000) ‘The robustness of Okun’s law: Evidence from OECD countries’, Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2), pp.

–356.

Lucas, R.E. (1976) ‘Econometric policy evaluation: A critique’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public

Policy, 1, pp. 19–46.

Mankiw, N.G. (2019) Macroeconomics. 10th edn. New York: Worth Publishers.

Mihajlović, V. and Fedajev, A. (2021) ‘Asymmetry of Okun’s law in European countries’, Economic Research-

Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), pp. 3068–3087.

Neifar, M. (2016) ‘Asymmetry in Okun’s law: Evidence from the MENA region’, Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 14,

pp. 1–10.

North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Okun, A.M. (1962) ‘Potential GNP: Its measurement and significance’, Proceedings of the Business and Economic

Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 98–104.

Phillips, A.W. (1958) ‘The relation between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the United

Kingdom, 1861–1957’, Economica, 25(100), pp. 283–299.

Phelps, E.S. (1967) ‘Phillips curves, expectations of inflation and optimal unemployment over time’, Economica,

(135), pp. 254–281.

Svejnar, J. (2002) ‘Transition economies: Performance and challenges’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), pp.

–28.

Taylor, J.B. (1993) ‘Discretion versus policy rules in practice’, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,

, pp. 195–214.

Woodford, M. (2003) Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton: Princeton University

Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

How to Cite

Zakhidov , A. (2026). INFLATION, ECONOMIC GROWTH, AND UNEMPLOYMENT: REVISITING THE PHILLIPS AND OKUN FRAMEWORKS IN THE CONTEXT OF JOB CREATION. Innovation Science and Technology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18726047
Loading...