UNCERTAINTY, STATE INVOLVEMENT, AND CORPORATE CONSOLIDATION: M&A CASE STUDIES FROM BRICS ECONOMIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18062689Abstract
This article investigates how firms in BRICS economies respond to economic policy uncertainty through
mergers and acquisitions (M&A), using a comparative case study approach. Focusing on major transactions in Brazil,
Russia, India, China, and South Africa, the study examines how institutional environments, ownership structures, and
governance arrangements shape corporate consolidation strategies under conditions of policy volatility, geopolitical risk,
and regulatory change. The analysis draws on in-depth case reviews of representative M&A transactions, including
state-influenced restructuring, private-sector consolidation, and cross-border acquisitions. Each case is analysed within
its national institutional context to identify the mechanisms through which uncertainty affects deal motivation, transaction
design, and post-merger integration. Particular attention is paid to the role of state ownership, compliance constraints,
sanctions exposure, and governance capacity in mediating firm responses to uncertainty. The study adopts an institutional
and comparative analytical framework, treating economic policy uncertainty as a structural feature of emerging markets
rather than a temporary shock. By comparing cases across distinct political–economic systems, the article highlights both
common adaptation patterns, such as domestic consolidation and strategic restructuring, and country-specific responses
driven by differences in regulatory regimes and state involvement. The novelty of the article lies in its systematic crosscountry
comparison of M&A cases under uncertainty within the BRICS bloc. The findings contribute to the qualitative
literature on corporate strategy in emerging markets by demonstrating how firms navigate uncertainty through governance
choices and ownership arrangements. The study also offers practical insights for policymakers and practitioners seeking
to understand how institutional design influences the effectiveness of M&A activity under persistent uncertainty
Keywords
economic policy uncertainty; mergers and acquisitions; emerging markets; BRICS; positivist methodology; institutional uncertainty.References
1. Ang, J. S., Daher, M., & Ismail, A. K. (2018). How do firms value debt capacity? Journal of Corporate Finance, 49,
2. –302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.01.005
3. Balcilar, M., Demirer, R., & Gupta, R. (2018). Geopolitical risks and stock market dynamics of the BRICS. Economic
4. Modelling, 72, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.01.023
5. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of
6. Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
7. Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225.
8. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
9. Carril-Caccia, F. (2023). Sanctions, geopolitical risk and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of International Financial
10. Markets, Institutions and Money, 86, 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101770
11. Col, B., & Sen, K. (2019). The political economy of India’s industrial policy. World Development, 114, 245–260. https://
12. doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.10.015
13. Del Bo, C., Ferraris, M., & Florio, M. (2017). Governments in the market for corporate control: Evidence from M&A
14. deals involving state-owned enterprises. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
15. jce.2016.10.002
16. Dikova, D., Sahib, P. R., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2019). Cross-border acquisition abandonment: The role of
17. institutional differences and organizational learning. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(4), 535–559. https://
18. doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0176-0
19. Gulen, H., & Ion, M. (2016). Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. Review of Financial Studies, 29(3), 523–564.
20. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv050
21. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The
22. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
23. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
24. Sha, Y., Kang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2020). Economic policy uncertainty and mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from China.
25. Economic Systems, 44(4), 100787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100787
26. World Bank. (2023). Global economic prospects: Emerging markets and uncertainty. Washington, DC: World Bank.
27. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
