A REALIST–POSITIVIST FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSING MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS UNDER ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18063128Abstract
This article articulates the research philosophy and epistemological foundations underpinning an empirical
investigation of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) under conditions of economic policy uncertainty in emerging markets,
with a particular focus on the BRICS economies. The study addresses growing methodological challenges associated
with analysing corporate behaviour in institutionally volatile environments characterised by policy unpredictability,
geopolitical risk, and regulatory change. Grounded in a realist–positivist paradigm, the article justifies the treatment of
economic policy uncertainty, ownership structures, and M&A outcomes as objective and observable phenomena that
can be systematically analysed using quantitative methods. The ontological position assumes that uncertainty manifests
through measurable policy actions and institutional constraints, while the epistemological stance emphasises empirical
observation, hypothesis testing, and econometric modelling as the primary means of knowledge generation. The paper
adopts a deductive methodological logic, drawing on real options theory, institutional economics, and corporate finance
theory to derive empirically testable assumptions regarding M&A initiation and deal completion under uncertainty.
Particular attention is given to endogeneity concerns inherent in uncertainty research, motivating the use of instrumental
variable techniques, robustness checks, and alternative model specifications. The novelty of the work lies in providing a
coherent philosophical and methodological justification for cross-country econometric analysis of M&A activity in emerging
markets, where uncertainty is structural rather than transitory. The article contributes to the literature by strengthening
the conceptual foundations for empirical research on corporate strategy under uncertainty and by offering a rigorous
framework applicable to policy-relevant analysis in reforming economies
Keywords
economic policy uncertainty, mergers and acquisitions, emerging markets, BRICS, positivist methodology, institutional uncertainty.References
1. Ang, J.S., Daher, M.M. and Ismail, A.K. (2018) ‘How do firms value debt capacity? Evidence from mergers and
2. acquisitions’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, pp. 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.11.006
3. Baker, S.R., Bloom, N. and Davis, S.J. (2016) ‘Measuring economic policy uncertainty’, Quarterly Journal of Economics,
4. (4), pp. 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
5. Balcilar, M., Demirer, R. and Gupta, R. (2018) ‘The role of economic policy uncertainty in predicting stock market
6. volatility: Evidence from emerging markets’, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 53, pp.
7. –18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.001
8. Batista, A.T.N. (2023) ‘Does economic policy uncertainty affect mergers and acquisitions? Evidence from emerging
9. economies’, Revista de Economía del Rosario, 26(2), pp. 1–28.
10. Bonaime, A., Gulen, H. and Ion, M. (2018) ‘Does policy uncertainty affect mergers and acquisitions?’, Journal of
11. Financial Economics, 129(3), pp. 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.05.007
12. Caldara, D. and Iacoviello, M. (2022) ‘Measuring geopolitical risk’, American Economic Review, 112(4), pp. 1194–
13. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
14. Carril-Caccia, F. (2023) ‘The impact of economic sanctions on mergers and acquisitions’, Journal of International
15. Business Studies, 54(6), pp. 1015–1038. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-022-00546-4
16. Cornaggia, J. and Li, J.Y. (2019) ‘The value of access to finance: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions’, Journal of
17. Financial Economics, 132(1), pp. 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.12.004
18. Del Bo, C., Ferraris, M. and Florio, M. (2017) ‘Governments in the market for corporate control: Evidence from
19. M&A deals involving state-owned enterprises’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(1), pp. 89–109. https://doi.
20. org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.08.002
21. Dikova, D., Sahib, P.R. and van Witteloostuijn, A. (2019) ‘Investment motives, ownership advantages, and institutional
22. distance: An examination of Russian cross-border acquisitions’, International Business Review, 28(3), pp. 625–637.
23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.12.006
24. Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S. (1994) Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25. Gulen, H. and Ion, M. (2015) ‘Policy uncertainty and corporate investment’, Review of Financial Studies, 29(3), pp.
26. –564. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv050
27. Hanousek, J. and Kočenda, E. (2023) ‘M&A activity, ownership, and productivity: Evidence from European transition
28. economies’, Economic Systems, 47(2), 101012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2022.101012
29. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1999) ‘Corporate ownership around the world’, Journal
30. of Finance, 54(2), pp. 471–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115
31. Li, W., Su, D. and Wang, Z. (2022) ‘How does economic policy uncertainty affect cross-border mergers and acquisitions?
32. Evidence from Chinese firms’, International Review of Economics & Finance, 79, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
33. iref.2021.12.005
34. Nguyen, N.H. and Phan, H.V. (2017) ‘Policy uncertainty and mergers and acquisitions’, Journal of Financial and
35. Quantitative Analysis, 52(2), pp. 613–644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000165
36. North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University
37. Press.
38. Petrova, D. and Trunin, P. (2023) ‘Estimation of economic policy uncertainty: Methodological issues and emerging
39. market evidence’, Economic Systems, 47(3), 101082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101082
40. Rodrik, D. (1991) ‘Policy uncertainty and private investment in developing countries’, Journal of Development
41. Economics, 36(2), pp. 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(91)90034-S
42. Sha, Y., Kang, C. and Wang, Z. (2020) ‘Economic policy uncertainty and mergers and acquisitions: Evidence from
43. China’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101636
44. Song, T. and Kutsuna, K. (2025) ‘The upside of uncertainty? Target-country policy risk and Chinese cross-border
45. mergers and acquisitions’, Journal of International Business Studies, 56(1), pp. 85–109.
46. World Bank (2023) Global Investment Competitiveness Report 2023: Investing in Uncertain Times. Washington, DC:
47. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
