A MULTI-LEVEL SYSTEM OF STATISTICAL INDICATORS FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT: METHODOLOGY AND APPROBATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19540610Keywords:
transport infrastructure; statistical indicators; integrated index; transport provision; Republic of Karakalpakstan; regional statistics; road network.Abstract
This article presents the methodology and approbation results of an original multi-level system of statistical
indicators for assessing regional transport infrastructure. The study addresses the limitations of existing one-dimensional
approaches that fail to simultaneously account for road surface quality, demographic characteristics, and spatial features
of territories. The research object is the transport infrastructure of the Republic of Karakalpakstan — the largest region of
the Republic of Uzbekistan by area (166,600 sq. km). The proposed system comprises five indicator blocks: quantitative,
qualitative, demographic, spatial, and economic. Based on these blocks, an integrated Infrastructure Transport Index
(ITI) is calculated, enabling inter-district comparisons. The system was tested using data for 2000–2025 across 16
administrative units of the republic. The ITI values range from 0.14 (Qo‘ng‘irot district) to 0.95 (Takhiatash district),
indicating significant intra-regional disparities in transport provision. The results can be applied by government authorities
in developing regional transport programmes.
References
Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., & Qian, N. (2020). On the road: Access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth
in China. Journal of Development Economics, 145, 102442.
Calderón, C., & Servén, L. (2008). Infrastructure and economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Policy
Research Working Paper, No. 4712.
Statistics Agency of the Republic of Karakalpakstan. (2025). Key socio-economic development indicators of the
Republic of Karakalpakstan. Nukus.
Engel, E. (1880). Das Zeitalter des Dampfes in technisch-statistischer Beleuchtung. Zeitschrift des Königlich
Preußischen Statistischen Bureaus, 20, 121–168.
Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies. Journal of Transport
Geography, 12(2), 127–140.
Ducruet, C., & Notteboom, T. (2012). The worldwide maritime network of container shipping. Global Networks, 12(3),
–423.
Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177–200.
Canning, D., & Pedroni, P. (2008). Infrastructure, long-run economic growth, and causality tests for cointegrated
panels. The Manchester School, 76(5), 504–527.
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.
Rodrigue, J.-P., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2020). The geography of transport systems (5th ed.). Routledge.
Kumar, A., & Barrett, F. (2008). Stuck in traffic: Urban transport in Africa. World Bank.
Rodrigue, J.-P., & Notteboom, T. (2010). Comparative North American and European gateway logistics. Journal of
Transport Geography, 18(4), 497–507.
Danilov, A. I. (2019). Methodology of statistical analysis of regional transport infrastructure. Issues of Statistics, 26(5),
–57.
Nosov, S. I. (2021). System of indicators for assessing territorial transport accessibility. Regional Economics: Theory
and Practice, 19(3), 486–508.
Usmonov, B. (2022). Statistical assessment of transport infrastructure in Central Asian regions. Economics and
Statistics, 4, 78–89.
Rahimov, A. (2023). Transport infrastructure as a factor of regional economic development in Uzbekistan. International
Journal of Economics and Finance, 15(2), 112–125.
Straub, S. (2011). Infrastructure and development: A critical appraisal of the macro-level literature. Journal of
Development Studies, 47(5), 683–708.
Keunimzhaev, M. K. (2025). Statistical assessment of the development processes of the transport infrastructure of
the region (on the example of the Republic of Karakalpakstan). World Economics and Finance Bulletin, 44, 282–285.
Keunimzhaev, M. K. (2026). Transport accessibility in Karakalpakstan: Spatial analysis and comparative assessment
of districts. Yashil Iqtisodiyot va Taraqqiyot, 2, 1339–1343.