SPIRAL MODELS OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT: TRIPLE, QUADRUPLE AND FIVE HELIX MODELS

SPIRAL MODELS OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT: TRIPLE, QUADRUPLE AND FIVE HELIX MODELS

Authors

  • Sultanova Munisa Samat kizi Basic doctoral student at the Research Center “Scientifc Bases and Issues of Economic Development Uzbekistan” at the Tashkent state university of economics https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4917-3269

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17403254

Keywords:

Innovation models, innovation model of the triple helix, the fourth helix of innovation, the ffth helix of innovation, open innovation

Abstract

The article analyzes the progress of the innovative Triple Helix model, the reasons and conditions for its change.
The initial model considered the interaction of the state, business structures and the scientifc (including university)
community. The article demonstrates how the interaction of elements becomes more complex with the appearance of a
fourth element, called the "public" (mass media, culture, creative industry, etc.). The role of this element in the innovation
model of the Quad Spiral is investigated. The signifcance of the work is to clarify the characteristics and conditions
of complication of innovative interaction. The innovation model of the Five Helix illustrates what qualitative changes
occur in the relationships of participants in the innovation process. It accumulates environmental and social aspects of
development.



References

1. Razinkina I. V. Development of the Innovation Spiral: a comparative analysis of innovation models of triple, quadruple

and fve helices// Economics and management of the national economy/ Economic Sciences No. 1 (206), 2022.

2. Milovidov V. (2020) The “Linked Prosperity” Model as an Integrated Response to Corporate Management

Challenges in a Network Society. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 14, no 4, pp. 112–120. DOI: 10.17323/2500-

2020.4.112.120.

3. Etzkowitz, Henry and Leydesdorff, Loet, The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory

for Knowledge Based Economic Development (January 1, 1995). EASST eview, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 14-19, 1995.

4. Leydesdorff, L., Ivanova, I. “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: can synergy in innovation

systems be measured? J. open innov. 2, 11 (2016).

5. Henry Itskowitz «Model triple spirals»//Innovation №4 (150), 2011.

6. Carayannis E. G., Campbell D. F. J. ‘Mode 3’and’Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem

//International journal of technology management. – 2009. – T. 46. – №. 3-4. – With. 201-234.

7. Carayannis E., Grigoroudis E. (2016) Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production

and National Competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 10, no 1, pp. 31–42. DOI: 10.17323/1995-

x.2016.1.31.42.

8. Bart, T. In. Incentives investments in infrastructure services projects social network areas of interest / T. In. Bart, In.

N. Martyniuk // Creative Economy. – 2021. – T. 15. – № 4. – With. 1295-1308. – DOI 10.18334/ce.15.4.112004.

9. Carayannis, E.G., Bart, T.D. & Campbell, D.F. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge

and driver for innovation. J Innov Entrep 1, 2 (2012).

10. Sultanova S. M. Modern world models of innovative development//Iqtisidiy taraqqiyot va tahlil №2, 2024, 597-605.

11. Khаmdаmov Sh. Strategies for Reducing Poverty in Developing Countries: a Multi-Faceted Approach// BEST

JOURNAL OF INNOVATION IN SCIENCE, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ISSN: 2835-3579 Volume:3 Issue:6

| 2024.

12. Abdulazizova U.N. The structure of the fnancial infrastructure: horizontal and vertical approaches// Collection

of materials of the III Republican scientifc and practical conference on the topic “Priority areas, modern trends and

prospects for the development of the fnancial market”, 180-183b.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-23

How to Cite

Sultanova Munisa Samat kizi. (2025). SPIRAL MODELS OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT: TRIPLE, QUADRUPLE AND FIVE HELIX MODELS. Innovation Science and Technology, 1(1), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17403254
Loading...