FORMING IMPORTANT METHODS FOR NURTURING STUDENTS’ EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES BASED ON NATIONAL-CULTURAL APPROACHES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17403225Keywords:
analytic hierarchy process (AHP), sentiment analysis, educational initiatives, cross-cultural interactions, student engagement, network formation, national-cultural approaches.Abstract
This article explores the importance of national-cultural approaches in fostering students' educational initiatives
and emphasizes the integration of cultural heritage into teaching practices. The study argues that cultural alignment in
education enhances student engagement, motivation, and overall learning outcomes. Using qualitative and quantitative
methods, the research gathers data through surveys and structured interviews with educators and students. Additionally,
a detailed analysis of educational policies and curricula provides a comprehensive understanding of the role of national
values in education. The fndings underline the need for culturally sensitive teaching methods to empower students and
improve their educational experience.
References
Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal,
(3), 465–491.
Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2007). The culturally responsive teacher. Educational Leadership, 64(6), 28–33.
Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational
Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
McCarty, T. L., & Lee, T. S. (2014). Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and Indigenous education
sovereignty. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 101–124.
Banks, J. A. (2004). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In J. A. Banks & C. A.
M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 3–29). Jossey-Bass.
Gollnick, D. M., & Chinn, P. C. (2013). Multicultural education in a pluralistic society (9th ed.). Pearson.
Howard, T. C. (2003). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Ingredients for critical teacher reflection. Theory Into Practice,
(3), 195–202.
Sleeter, C. E. (2011). An agenda to strengthen culturally responsive pedagogy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique,
(2), 7–23.
Kea, C. D., Campbell-Whatley, G. D., & Richards, H. V. (2006). Becoming culturally responsive educators: Rethinking
teacher education pedagogy. National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1),
–84
Au, K. H., & Jordan, C. (1981). Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a culturally appropriate solution. In H.
Trueba, G. Guthrie, & K. H. Au (Eds.), Culture and the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography (pp.
–152). Newbury House.
Erickson, F., & Mohatt, G. (1982). Cultural organization of participation structures in two classrooms of Indian students.
In G. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling: Educational anthropology in action (pp. 132–174). Holt,
Rinehart & Winston.
Samuels, A. J. (2018). Exploring culturally responsive pedagogy: Teachers’ perspectives on fostering equitable and
inclusive classrooms. The SRATE Journal, 27(1), 22–30.
