RISK MANAGEMENT IN ISLAMIC BANKING: PRINCIPLES, PRACTICES, AND CHALLENGES

RISK MANAGEMENT IN ISLAMIC BANKING: PRINCIPLES, PRACTICES, AND CHALLENGES

Authors

  • Safarova Nasiba Gulmurod kizi Assistant teacher, Tashkent State University of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17436605

Keywords:

Islamic Banking, Risk Management, Islamic Finance, Riba, Risk-Sharing, Ethical Investment, Challenges, Practices.

Abstract

This article explores the principles, practices, and challenges associated with risk management in Islamic
banking. With the rising prominence of Islamic finance globally, particularly in countries with large Muslim populations,
it is crucial to understand the unique aspects of risk management that differentiate Islamic banking from conventional
banking systems. The study focuses on key Islamic finance principles such as the prohibition of interest (riba), risksharing,
and ethical investment, which influence the way risks are identified, assessed, and managed. By conducting
a comprehensive review of existing literature and analyzing current practices, this paper provides a detailed overview
of the risk management framework in Islamic banks, highlighting both the advantages and challenges inherent in these
systems.

References

Ahmed, H. (2020). Islamic finance: Risk management and operational challenges. Routledge.

Al-Salem, F. (2021). Shariah compliance and risk management in Islamic banks. International Journal of Islamic

Financial Studies, 12(3), 45–61.

Ayub, M. (2020). Understanding Islamic banking: A risk-based perspective. Oxford University Press.

Bakar, M. (2022). Investment strategies in Islamic banking: Risk and returns. Journal of Islamic Economics and

Finance, 14(2), 23–40.

Zubair, M., & Rashid, A. (2020). Liquidity risk management in Islamic banks: Practices and developments. Islamic

Finance Review, 11(1), 77–91.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Safarova Nasiba Gulmurod kizi. (2025). RISK MANAGEMENT IN ISLAMIC BANKING: PRINCIPLES, PRACTICES, AND CHALLENGES. Innovation Science and Technology, 1(4), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17436605
Loading...