PRIORITY DIRECTIONS FOR FORMING ECOLOGICALLY ORIENTED MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISES

PRIORITY DIRECTIONS FOR FORMING ECOLOGICALLY ORIENTED MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISES

Authors

  • Kholov Hamza Tajiddinovich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20374765

Keywords:

environmental management, construction industry, green technologies, sustainable development, ISO 14001, environmental audit, waste management, PESTEL analysis, resource efficiency, environmental culture

Abstract

This article examines the theoretical and methodological foundations, practical necessity, and priority
directions for the formation of ecologically oriented management in construction industry enterprises. In the context of
the growing environmental impact of industrial and construction enterprises, the rational use of natural resources, waste
reduction, environmental safety assurance, and improvement of economic efficiency are considered urgent issues. The study
employs methods of systematic analysis, comparative analysis, grouping and classification, statistical analysis, PESTEL
analysis, as well as ecological-economic approaches. The article analyzes the scientific views of foreign and CIS scholars
regarding the concept of environmental management and highlights the specific features of implementing environmental
management systems in enterprises, the significance of ISO 14001 and EMAS standards, and the possibilities of applying
environmental audit, monitoring, and green technologies. In addition, based on the trends in waste volume growth in the
Republic of Uzbekistan during 2015–2024, the necessity of improving environmental management mechanisms in the
construction industry is substantiated

Author Biography

Kholov Hamza Tajiddinovich

Tashkent University of Architecture and Construction
Deputy dean for student affairs and spiritual-educational affairs

References

Бурук А. Ф., Александров И. А. Анализ применения системы экологического менеджмента предприятия в

Украине // Труды IX Международной научной конференции. Ч. 5. – Донецк: ДонНТУ, 2008. – С. 202–204.

Yang, Yang, & Peng. Environmental Management Approaches // Tourism Recreation Research. – 2011.

Carter, R., & Ross, K. Environmental Management and Human–Environment Relations // Australasian Journal of

Environmental Management. – 2014.

Mensah, I., & Blankson, E. Environmental Management and Social-Economic Priorities // International Journal of

Hospitality & Tourism Administration. – 2014.

Baker, M., Cohanier, B., & Gibassier, D. Environmental Management Systems and Sustainable Development // Social

and Environmental Accountability Journal. – 2018.

Реймерс Н. Ф. Природопользование: словарь-справочник. – М.: Мысль, 1990.

Данилов-Данильян В. И., Лосев К. С. Экологический вызов и устойчивое развитие. – М.: Прогресс-Традиция,

Буторин А. П. Экономика природопользования. – М.: ИНФРА-М, 2003.

Яблоков А. В., Остроумов С. А. Уровни охраны живой природы. – М.: Наука, 2003.

Балабанов И. Т. Основы менеджмента. – М.: Финансы и статистика, 2001.

Qodirov, A. Methods for Determining Economic Damage to the Environment // American Journal of Economics and

Business Management. – 2024. – Vol. 7, No. 12. – Pp. 1690–1698.

Главинская Л. Т. Экологический менеджмент и устойчивое развитие // Вестник Московского университета.

Серия 6: Экономика. – 2005. – № 2.

Темирханов К. Оценка экологической результативности деятельности природопользователей // Экология и

промышленность. – 2006. – № 2(10). – С. 8–11.

Норт К. Основы экологического менеджмента. – М., 1994.

Ахмедьярова М. В. Экологический менеджмент как фактор обеспечения конкурентоспособности страны и

повышения качества жизни // Вестник УМБ. – 2007. – № 2.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Kholov , H. (2026). PRIORITY DIRECTIONS FOR FORMING ECOLOGICALLY ORIENTED MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISES. Innovation Science and Technology, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20374765
Loading...