RECONCEPTUALIZING BUSINESS INCUBATORS IN STARTUP ECOSYSTEMS: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20310094Abstract
This study conceptualizes business incubators as pivotal institutional actors within startup
ecosystems and examines their evolving role in supporting innovation-driven entrepreneurship.
The study employs a qualitative conceptual approach that combines systematic literature analysis,
comparative evaluation, and theoretical synthesis. The analysis explores the functional roles of business
incubators, their interaction mechanisms with startups, and their evolutionary development within entrepreneurial
support infrastructures.
Building on established theoretical perspectives, including institutional theory, the resource-based view,
ecosystem theory, and network theory, the study develops a multidimensional framework that systematizes the
role of business incubators across key functional domains. In addition, a theoretical matrix is proposed to map
core incubator functions to corresponding scientific perspectives, enabling a more structured interpretation of
their systemic impact.
The findings contribute to a more integrated understanding of business incubators as hybrid institutional
mechanisms that simultaneously operate as resource providers, knowledge intermediaries, and ecosystem
coordinators. This study advances the academic literature by proposing a consolidated conceptual model that
clarifies the position of business incubators within startup ecosystems and highlights their role in facilitating
innovation-driven development.
Keywords
business incubators, startup ecosystems, innovation systems, entrepreneurial ecosystems, institutional theory, resource-based view, network theory.References
1. Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1–2), 20–28. https://doi.
2. org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.008
3. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning off new ventures: A typology of
4. incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183–216.
5. Ayyash, S., McAdam, M., & O’Gorman, C. (2022). Towards a new perspective on the heterogeneity of business
6. incubator-incubation definitions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(4).
7. Lin-Lian, C., De-Pablos-Heredero, C., Montes-Botella, J. L., & Lin, S. (2022). The influence of entrepreneurial
8. motivation on the valuation of socioeconomic benefits of business incubator functions. Economies, 10(11), 281. https://
9. doi.org/10.3390/economies10110281
10. Elia, G., Alessandro, M., Enrico, C., & Karim, M. (2021). Digital Society Incubator: Combining exponential technology
11. and human potential to build resilient entrepreneurial ecosystems. Administrative Sciences, 11, 96. https://doi.
12. org/10.3390/admsci11030096
13. Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—Leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal
14. of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290.
15. Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, 27(5), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.12.002
16. Bosques-Brugada, G., Mendoza-del Villar, L. A., & López, E. O. (2019). Specialized business incubators as a strategy
17. for small and medium-sized enterprises in the Industry 4.0 era – A systemic approach. In Proceedings of the 7th
18. International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (ICIE 2019) (pp. 106–114).
19. OECD. (2021). International policy approaches to digitalising the delivery of business incubator services – Lessons for
20. Thailand (OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers, No. 26). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/76059c16-en
21. Cruz, C. B., O’Loughlin, T., & Loreto, A. B. (2016). Technology business incubation in a Philippine State University:
22. Lessons learned from a South Australia-based leading technology business incubator. International Journal of
23. Business and Social Science, 7(2), 195–202.
24. Wei, S., Zhang, Z., & Chen, X. (2021). How does business incubator motivate start-ups based on super-network: A
25. dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40, 11131–11144.
26. Hakim, A. I., Sukimi, M. F., & Ab Rahman, A. H. (2022). Exploring the role of business incubators in sustainable
27. startups: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,
28. (11), 1198–1215. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i11/15147
29. Cao, Z., Cunningham, L. F., Gao, W., & Liu, Y. (2020). The downsides of specialization: The impact of business
30. incubator specialization on startups’ R&D efficiency and venture capital financing. Technovation, 96–97, 102143.
31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102143
32. UNECE. (2021). Business Incubators for Sustainable Development in the SPECA Subregion. Geneva, p. 15.
33. OECD. (2024). Start-Up Globalization through Incubation and Acceleration. Paris: OECD Publishing, p. 10.
34. IT Park Uzbekistan. Ўзбекистон IT соҳасининг локомотиви.
35. IT Park Uzbekistan: итоги трёхлетия.
36. Ministry of Digital Technologies of Uzbekistan. Official website.
37. Innovation Development Agency of Uzbekistan. Official website.
38. Dutt, N., Hawn, O., Vidal, E., Chatterji, A., McGahan, A., & Mitchell, W. (2016). How open system intermediaries
39. address institutional failures: The case of business incubators in emerging-market countries. Academy of Management
40. Journal, 59(3), 818–840.
41. Somsuk, N., Laosirihongthong, T., & McLean, M. W. (2012). Strategic management of university business incubators
42. (UBIs): Resource-based view (RBV) theory. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation &
43. Technology (ICMIT) (pp. 611–618). Bali, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2012.6225876
44. Liu, Y. et al. (2020). The micro-foundations of global business incubation: A stakeholder perspective. Technological
45. Forecasting and Social Change, 161.
46. Alsos, G. A., Hytti, U., & Ljunggren, E. (2011). Stakeholder theory approach to technology incubators. International
47. Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 17(6), 607–625.
48. Марахина, И. В. (2020). Теоретические аспекты функционирования стартап-экосистемы. Цифровая
49. трансформация, 3(12), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.38086/2522-9613-2020-3-31-38
50. Eveleens, C. P., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & van Weele, A. J. (2017). How network-based incubation helps start-up
51. performance: A systematic review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 677–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/
52. s10961-016-9538-z
53. Li, C., Hassan, M. S., Ayyash, S. A., Parveen, R., & Ali, K. (2020). Role of business incubators as a tool for
54. entrepreneurship development: The mediating and moderating role of business incubation and professional networks.
55. Sustainability, 12(5), 1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051822
56. Redondo, M., Galcuera, C., & Galindo, M. (2022). Exchange of knowledge in protected environments: The case
57. of university business incubators. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(1), 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
58. jik.2022.100168
59. Romein, A., & Trip, J. J. (2017). The role of business incubators in the development of creative and cultural industries
60. clusters. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 226, 805–814. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP170691
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
