TAX REVENUE REDISTRIBUTION, HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINTS AND LOCAL FISCAL STABILITY IN UZBEKISTAN

TAX REVENUE REDISTRIBUTION, HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINTS AND LOCAL FISCAL STABILITY IN UZBEKISTAN

Authors

  • Sharipov Abror Komilovich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19425439

Keywords:

fiscal decentralization; intergovernmental transfers; hard budget constraints; local budgets; budget discipline; Uzbekistan; RP-387

Abstract

This article examines Uzbekistan’s 2026 fiscal reform package not as an isolated revenue-sharing decision,
but as a combined governance mechanism that links greater local revenue retention with harder budget constraints. The
paper focuses on Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, dd 26.12.2025 № RP-387 and analyzes it
together with the Budget Code, procurement rules, and official fiscal indicators for 2019-2026. It is indicated that local
budget revenues increased from 31.1 trln soum in 2019 to 76.0 trln soum in 2026, while local expenditures rose from
38.9 trln soum to 95.6 trln soum over the same period. The vertical fiscal gap therefore persisted at around 19.6 trln
soum in 2026, despite revenue growth, and regulatory transfers remained a key equalization tool (Law No. 1105, 2025).
At the consolidated level, 2026 budget revenues are projected at 515.4 trln soum, expenditures at 567.0 trln soum, and
the overall fiscal balance at -59.9 trln soum, which is about 3.0% of GDP (BUDJETNOMA, 2026). These figures suggest
that expanding local fiscal space without strict expenditure discipline would risk soft budget constraints, arrears, and
non-priority spending. The article’s main contribution is to show that RP-387 dd. 26.12.2025 (RP-387, 2025) should be
interpreted as a dual reform package: revenue decentralization on the one hand and a discipline anchor, embodied in
sections, on the other. Because the official post-reform time series is still short, the paper relies on descriptive quantitative
diagnostics rather than causal econometric claims; however, it also formulates a panel-ready specification for future
testing. The results imply that the effectiveness of revenue reassignment depends on transparent revenue assignment,
commitment control, procurement integrity, and disciplined use of savings from staff optimization

Author Biography

Sharipov Abror Komilovich

Phd, 

References

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan On the State budget of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2026 No.1105, 26.12.2025,

Annex 6, 7.

BUDJETNOМА 2026-2028. https://api.mf.uz/media/filestore/2026-2028-yillar_uchun_Budjetnoma.pdf

Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. RP-387, “On additional measures to increase the

financial stability of local budgets and budget organizations and to strengthen budget disciplin.” (2025, December 26).

Boadway, R., & Shah, A. (2007). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice.

Washington, DC: World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/831241468161662497/

pdf/380770Fiscal0t101OFFICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf

Flynn, S., & Pessoa, M. (2014). Prevention and management of government arrears. IMF Technical Notes and

Manuals, 2014(003). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498313650.005

Budget Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (effective January 1, 2014).

Dougherty, S., Montes Nebreda, A., & Mota, T. (2024). Adapting intergovernmental fiscal transfers for the future:

Emerging trends and innovative approaches. OECD Publishing.

Carroll, D. A. (2009). Diversifying municipal government revenue structures: Fiscal illusion or instability? Public

Budgeting & Finance, 29(1), 27–48.

Yan, W. (2011). The interactive effect of revenue diversification and economic base on US local government revenue

stability. Public Money & Management, 31(6), 419–426.

Faguet, J.-P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13.

Kornai, J., Maskin, E., & Roland, G. (2003). Understanding the soft budget constraint. Journal of Economic Literature,

(4), 1095–1136.

Dowley, K. M. (2006). Local government transparency in East Central Europe. Local Government Studies, 32(5),

–583.

Esteller-Moré, A., & Polo Otero, J. (2012). Fiscal transparency: (Why) does your local government respond? Public

Management Review, 14(8), 1153–1173.

Manes-Rossi, F., Brusca, I., Levy Orelli, R., Lorson, P. C., & Haustein, E. (2023). Features and drivers of citizen

participation: Insights from participatory budgeting in three European cities. Public Management Review, 25(2), 201–

Noori, N. (2006). Expanding state authority, cutting back local services: Decentralization and its contradictions in

Uzbekistan. Central Asian Survey, 25(4), 533–549.

Jumayev, S. (2023). Effectiveness of formation of revenue base of local budgets. International Journal of Advanced

Research, 11(3), 1149–1160.

Imanova, U. B. (2024). Improving the mechanism for managing financial resources of local budgets to promote

socio-economic development of regions in Uzbekistan. American Journal of Business Management, Economics and

Banking, 30, 86–89.

Khamidov, K. H. (2025). Reforms and prospects for the development of the participatory budgeting initiative in

Uzbekistan. Innovation Science and Technology, 1(12).

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. 684, On Public Procurement. 2021, April 22.

President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, December 26). Address of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Shavkat Mirziyoyev to the Oliy Majlis and the people of Uzbekistan. https://president.uz/en/lists/view/8834

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Sharipov , A. (2026). TAX REVENUE REDISTRIBUTION, HARD BUDGET CONSTRAINTS AND LOCAL FISCAL STABILITY IN UZBEKISTAN. Innovation Science and Technology, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19425439
Loading...