INSTITUTIONAL COORDINATION AND TOURISM GOVERNANCE IN UZBEKISTAN: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

INSTITUTIONAL COORDINATION AND TOURISM GOVERNANCE IN UZBEKISTAN: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Akkulov Abdulaziz Uralbaevich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18642458

Keywords:

tourism governance; institutional coordination; public administration; tourism policy; Uzbekistan; sustainable tourism.

Abstract

The tourism sector is characterized by a complex institutional structure involving multiple public and private
stakeholders, which requires effective coordination and governance mechanisms. In recent years, Uzbekistan has
implemented significant reforms aimed at enhancing tourism development; however, challenges related to institutional
coordination remain. This study examines the governance and management of institutional structures coordinating the
tourism sector in Uzbekistan through a combined theoretical and empirical approach. The research employs qualitative
policy analysis, comparative institutional analysis, and expert assessments to evaluate the effectiveness of existing
coordination mechanisms. The findings reveal that despite improvements in strategic planning and regulatory frameworks,
institutional fragmentation, overlapping mandates, and limited horizontal coordination continue to constrain effective
tourism governance. Based on international best practices, the study proposes policy recommendations to strengthen
institutional coordination, enhance inter-agency collaboration, and improve governance efficiency in the tourism sector.
The results contribute to the literature on tourism governance in transitional economies and offer practical implications
for policymakers.

Author Biography

Akkulov Abdulaziz Uralbaevich

Independent researcher of Tashkent State University of Economics

References

Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Measures to create a management system in the spheres

of ecology and tourism capable of promptly responding to the demands of the population” (Decree № DP-217, 18

November 2025). https://www.lex.uz/uz/docs/7851417

Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable

Tourism, 19(4–5), 411–421.

European Commission. (2019). European tourism governance and destination management practices.

Hall, C. M. (2011). A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis. Journal of Sustainable

Tourism, 19(4–5), 437–457.

Japan Tourism Agency. (2022). Tourism governance and destination management frameworks in Japan.

OECD. (2024). OECD Tourism Trends and Policies 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2024). Creating Economic Prosperity through Inclusive and Sustainable Tourism: G7/OECD Policy Priorities

Paper. OECD Tourism Papers, No. 2024/01. Paris: OECD Publishing.

World Tourism Cities Federation. (2024–2025). World Tourism Cities Development Report & World Tourism Destination

Competitive Potential Index Report (2025). Beijing: WTCF.

United Nations World Tourism Organization (2025). World Tourism Barometer and Global Tourism Trends. Madrid:

UN-Tourism.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

How to Cite

Akkulov , A. (2026). INSTITUTIONAL COORDINATION AND TOURISM GOVERNANCE IN UZBEKISTAN: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS. Innovation Science and Technology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18642458
Loading...