A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UZBEKISTAN’S INNOVATION EFFICIENCY: EVALUATING GII OUTPUT–INPUT RATIOS RELATIVE TO LEADING AND EMERGING INNOVATIVE ECONOMIES

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UZBEKISTAN’S INNOVATION EFFICIENCY: EVALUATING GII OUTPUT–INPUT RATIOS RELATIVE TO LEADING AND EMERGING INNOVATIVE ECONOMIES

Authors

  • Umidjon Khoshimov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17697070

Keywords:

innovation efficiency, Global Innovation Index (GII), Uzbekistan, comparative analysis, innovation policy, R&D commercialization, national innovation system

Abstract

Utilizing Global Innovation Index (GII) data, this study evaluates Uzbekistan’s innovation efficiency between
2020 and 2025 and compares it with top overperformers (India, Viet Nam, Morocco), regional peers (Kazakhstan,
Azerbaijan), and global leaders (Switzerland, Sweden, United States). Uzbekistan’s GII ranking improved to 79th in 2025,
yet its innovation outputs remain significantly weaker than its inputs, resulting in an average output–input efficiency gap
of –23 ranks. While Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan underperform relative to their potential, India, Viet Nam, and Morocco
exceed expectations based on their input levels. The main challenge for Uzbekistan is not investment scarcity but low
commercialization of research due to weak industry–science linkages and limited high-tech exports. The study concludes
that Uzbekistan must strengthen national innovation system coordination, attract foreign investment, and expand sectorspecific
venture capital to foster an innovation-driven economy

Author Biography

Umidjon Khoshimov


Advisor to the Director of the Agency for Innovative
Development under the Ministry of Higher Education,
Science, and Innovation
Tashkent State University of Economics

References

Bakari, S. (2024). The impact of innovation and economic growth: Evidence from developed and developing countries.

International Journal of Economics and Finance, 14(1), 32–54. https://ideas.repec.org/a/wei/journl/v14y2024i1p32-54.

html (Accessed: 2025–10–17).

BIAC/OECD. (2023). Competition and innovation – Note by BIAC. OECD Competition Committee Discussion Paper,

DAF/COMP/WD(2023)55. Paris: OECD. https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2023)55/en/pdf (Accessed:

–10–04).

Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Unlocking the promise of social innovation.

Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2024/ (Accessed:

–09–14).

Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2025). Global Innovation Index 2025: Innovation in the face of uncertainty.

Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2025/ (Accessed:

–09–14).

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.

Guan, J., & Chen, K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy, 41(1),

–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.001

Kim, L., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). Technology, learning, and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing

economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lema, R., Kraemer-Mbula, E., & Rakas, M. (2021). Innovation in developing countries: Examining two decades of

research. Innovation and Development, 11(2–3), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2021.1989647

Morocco World News. (2025, September 16). Morocco secures record 57th ranking in Global Innovation Index.

Morocco World News. https://www.moroccoworldnews.com (Accessed: 2025–10–04).

Nasierowski, W., & Arcelus, F. J. (2003). On the efficiency of national innovation systems. Socio-Economic Planning

Sciences, 37(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00046-0

OECD. (2023). Competition, innovation and productivity. Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs, Committee

on Competition, DAF/COMP/WD(2023)56. Paris: OECD. https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2023)56/

en/pdf (Accessed: 2025–10–04).

PatentRenewal.com. (2024, October). Which countries are driving global innovation in 2024? PatentRenewal Blog.

https://www.patentrenewal.com/post/the-worlds-most-innovative-countries-in-2024 (Accessed: 2025–09–14).

Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102.

https://doi.org/10.1086/261725

Tziogkidis, P., Papadimitriou, P., & Dergiades, T. (2018). Innovation efficiency ratio: Measuring the effectiveness of

R&D expenditures (Working Paper). Houston: Rice University, Department of Economics. https://economics.rice.edu/

sites/g/files/bxs4046/files/2020-10/Tziogkidis%20et%20al.%202018.pdf (Accessed: 2025–09–14).

Tziogkidis, P., Philippas, D., Leontitsis, A., & Sickles, R. C. (2020). A data envelopment analysis and local partial least

squares approach for identifying the optimal innovation policy direction. European Journal of Operational Research,

(3), 1011–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.023

UNESCO. (2024). Mapping research and innovation in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.

unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374566 (Accessed: 2025–09–14).

WIPO. (2019). Global Innovation Index 2019: Creating healthy lives – The future of medical innovation. Geneva: World

Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index/en/2019/ (Accessed: 2025–09–14).

Downloads

Published

2025-11-01

How to Cite

Khoshimov, U. (2025). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UZBEKISTAN’S INNOVATION EFFICIENCY: EVALUATING GII OUTPUT–INPUT RATIOS RELATIVE TO LEADING AND EMERGING INNOVATIVE ECONOMIES. Innovation Science and Technology, 1(11). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17697070
Loading...