TAXATION IN TRANSITION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA AND UZBEKISTAN’S TAX SYSTEMS (2011–2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17445985Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of the tax systems in Indonesia and Uzbekistan from 2011 to 2023,
focusing on tax revenue performance, structural composition, and administrative reforms. Drawing on World Bank, IMF,
and OECD data, as well as recent academic literature, the paper highlights how institutional context shapes tax policy
outcomes. While Indonesia demonstrates gradual progress through digitalization and policy consensus, it continues to
face challenges from low compliance and a large informal sector. Uzbekistan, in contrast, has implemented top-down
reforms that have improved revenue stability and administrative efficiency. The analysis reveals that hybrid strategies
combining simplification, technological innovation, and institutional trust are essential for building effective tax systems in
developing countries.
Keywords
tax reform, Indonesia, Uzbekistan, tax administration, comparative fiscal policy, digitalization, tax-to-GDP ratio, developing countries.References
1. Asian Development Bank. (2022). Asian Development Outlook: Promoting Tax Equity. Manila: ADB.
2. Basri, M. C., & Rahardja, S. (2011). The Indonesian economy amidst the global crisis. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic
3. Studies, 47(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2011.556054
4. Bird, R. M., & Zolt, E. M. (2014). Redistribution via taxation: The limited role of the personal income tax in developing
5. countries. UCLA Law Review, 52(6), 1627–1695.
6. Dabla-Norris, E., & Gradstein, M. (2022). Informality and development: Revisiting the evidence. IMF Working Paper,
7. WP/22/34. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513575979.001
8. EY Uzbekistan. (2024). Tax Alerts and Updates: Fiscal Year 2024 Reforms. Retrieved from https://www.ey.com/en_uz
9. IMF. (2023). Uzbekistan: 2023 Article IV Consultation Report. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
10. KPMG Indonesia. (2023). Tax Incentives in Indonesia 2023. Retrieved from https://home.kpmg/id
11. Luttmer, E. F. P., & Singhal, M. (2014). Tax morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 149–168. https://doi.
12. org/10.1257/jep.28.4.149
13. Martinez-Vazquez, J., McNab, R. M., & Vaillancourt, F. (2018). Tax reform in Indonesia: Challenges and prospects.
14. International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, 1803.
15. Nugroho, A. H., & Prasetyo, A. R. (2020). E-taxation and tax compliance in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration
16. Studies, 15(2), 112–130.
17. OECD. (2022). Tax Administration 2022: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging
18. Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
19. OECD/G20. (2021). Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
20. Prawira, I. F. A., Kustiawan, M., Putra, A., & Anggrayni, F. (2023). The role of tax officer on MSME taxpayer compliance:
21. Case study Indonesia. *Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences*, 11(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.31580/apss.v11i1.2804
22. Prawira, I. F. A. (2020). Corporate governance and tax aggressiveness: An evidence on manufacturing companies
23. in Indonesia. *International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies*, 8(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijaes.
24. v8i1.31274
25. PwC Indonesia. (2023). Indonesia Tax Profile 2023. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/id
26. Simanjuntak, R. A., & Silaban, R. (2019). Tax incentives and industrial upgrading in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian
27. Economic Studies, 55(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1639492
28. UNCTAD. (2022). World Investment Report: International Tax Reforms and Sustainable Investment. Geneva: United
29. Nations.
30. World Bank. (2020). Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Washington, DC: World
31. Bank.
32. World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org
33. Zucman, G. (2014). Taxing across borders: Tracking personal wealth and corporate profits. Journal of Economic
34. Perspectives, 28(4), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.121
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
