APPROACHES TO IMPROVING KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE PROCESSES IN INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21288185Abstract
The study analyzed the theoretical foundations for improving knowledge exchange processes within industrial
clusters. The cluster was interpreted as a system that facilitated knowledge flows among diverse participants and supported
innovation activities. The relationship between knowledge flow, absorptive capacity, and network structure was examined, and the
main factors strengthening knowledge exchange were systematically identified. Particular attention was given to organizational
diversity, innovation networks, digital platforms, and trust-based cooperation mechanisms. The findings demonstrated that
the effectiveness of knowledge exchange depended not on isolated tools but on their coordinated and integrated application.
The study showed that strengthening human capital, enhancing collaborative relationships, and gradually introducing digital
channels contributed to more effective knowledge sharing and innovation performance. Practical directions for developing
knowledge exchange systems in emerging economies were also established.
Keywords
industrial cluster, knowledge exchange, knowledge flow, absorptive capacity, innovation network, digital platform, cluster policy, regional development.References
1. Franco M., Esteves L., Rodrigues M. Clusters as a Mechanism of Sharing Knowledge and Innovation: Case
2. Study from a Network Approach // Global Business Review. 2024. Vol. 25, No. 2. P. 377-400. URL: https://doi.
3. org/10.1177/0972150920957270
4. Xu Y., Li X., Tao C., Zhou X. Connected knowledge spillovers, technological cluster innovation and efficient industrial
5. structure // Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2022. Vol. 7, No. 3. Art. 100195. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
6. jik.2022.100195
7. Kim H., Hwang S.-J., Yoon W. Industry cluster, organizational diversity, and innovation // International Journal of
8. Innovation Studies. 2023. Vol. 7, No. 3. P. 187-195. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2023.04.002
9. Arsanti T. A., Rupidara N. S., Bondarouk T. Managing knowledge flows within open innovation: knowledge sharing
10. and absorption mechanisms in collaborative innovation // Cogent Business & Management. 2024. Vol. 11, No. 1. Art.
11. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2351832
12. He Z., Wang H., Hu Y., Ma X., Zhao H. Dynamic analysis and optimal control of knowledge diffusion model in regional
13. innovation ecosystem under digitalization // Scientific Reports. 2024. Vol. 14. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-
14. -3
15. Nguyen H.-O. T., Nguyen K.-D. Moderator effect of industrial park on knowledge spillover from sectoral innovation to
16. firm performance in Vietnam // Cogent Economics & Finance. 2024. Vol. 12, No. 1. Art. 2403708. URL: https://doi.org/
17. 1080/23322039.2024.2403708
18. Li C., Cao X., Chi M., Jiang L.-L. Research on an evolutionary game model and simulation of a cluster innovation
19. network based on fairness preference // PLOS ONE. 2020. Vol. 15, No. 1. Art. e0226777. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/
20. journal.pone.0226777
21. Zhang L., Xiong K., Gao X., Yang Y. Factors influencing innovation performance of China’s high-end manufacturing
22. clusters: Dual-perspective from the digital economy and the innovation networks // Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. Vol.
23. Art. 1012228. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012228
24. Faeroevik K. H., Maehle N. Cross-industry innovation for sustainable repositioning through cluster collaboration //
25. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2024. Vol. 33, No. 8. P. 1185-1202. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438
26. 2024.2427837
27. Li H., Yang Z., Jin C., Wang J. How an industrial internet platform empowers the digital transformation of SMEs:
28. theoretical mechanism and business model // Journal of Knowledge Management. 2023. Vol. 27, No. 1. P. 105-120.
29. URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2022-0757
30. Liu Q., Zhang Y., Sun X. Digital innovation ecosystems and regional green technological innovation: Evidence from
31. China’s panel-QCA analysis // Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2025. Vol. 10, No. 5. Art. 100789. URL: https://doi.
32. org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100789
33. Parrilli M. D. Cluster policy: the challenging and complex horizon in the 2020s // European Planning Studies. 2024. Vol.
34. , No. 9. P. 1868-1884. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2239281
35. Remotti L. A. IoT innovation clusters in Europe and the case for public policy // Data & Policy. 2021. Vol. 3. Art. e25.
36. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.16
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
